If EIGEN_DONT_VECTORIZE is defined, immintrin.h is not included even if F16C is available. Trying to use F16C intrinsics thus fails.
This fixes issue #2395.
(cherry picked from commit c06c3e52a0)
- Doing computation with uninitialized (zero-ed ? but thanks Linux) matrix, or
worse NaN on other non-linux systems.
- This commit fixes it by initializing to Random().
(cherry picked from commit 4284c68fbb)
& and | short-circuit, && and || don't. When both arguments to those
are boolean, the short-circuiting version is usually the desired one, so
clang warns on this.
Here, it is inconsequential, so switch to && and || to suppress the warning.
(cherry picked from commit b17bcddbca)
For vectorized 1-dimensional inputs that do not take the special
blocking path (e.g. `std::complex<...>`), there was an
index-out-of-bounds error causing the broadcast size to be
computed incorrectly. Here we fix this, and make other minor
cleanup changes.
Fixes#2351.
(cherry picked from commit a500da1dc0)
Fixes compiler errors in expressions that look like
Eigen::Matrix<Eigen::half, 3, 1>::Random().maxCoeff()
The error comes from the code that creates the initial value for
vectorized reductions. The fix is to specify the scalar type of the
reduction's initial value.
The cahnge is necessary for Eigen::half because unlike other types,
Eigen::half scalars cannot be implicitly created from integers.
(cherry picked from commit d0e3791b1a)
We currently have plenty of type definitions with the alignment
qualifier coming after the type. The compiler warns about ignoring
them:
int EIGEN_ALIGN16 ai[4];
Turn this into:
EIGEN_ALIGN16 int ai[4];
(cherry picked from commit 8faafc3aaa)
For some reason, having `take<n, numeric_list<T>>` for `n > 0` causes
g++-11 to ICE with
```
sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack
```
It does work with other versions of gcc, and with clang.
I filed a GCC bug
[here](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102999).
Technically we should never actually run into this case, since you
can't take n > 0 elements from an empty list. Commenting it out
allows our Eigen tests to pass.
(cherry picked from commit 8f8c2ba2fe)
MSVC does not support specializing compound assignments for
`std::complex`, since it already specializes them (contrary to the
standard).
Trying to use one of these on device will currently lead to a
duplicate definition error. This is still probably preferable
to no error though. If we remove the definitions for MSVC, then
it will compile, but the kernel will fail silently.
The only proper solution would be to define our own custom `Complex`
type.
(cherry picked from commit f0f1d7938b)