Some some header guards were repeated between the `AltiVec` package and the
`ZVector` packages. This could cause a problem if (for whatever reason) someone
attempts to include headers for both architectures.
We currently have plenty of type definitions with the alignment
qualifier coming after the type. The compiler warns about ignoring
them:
int EIGEN_ALIGN16 ai[4];
Turn this into:
EIGEN_ALIGN16 int ai[4];
Originating from
[this SO issue](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65901014/how-to-solve-this-all-error-2-in-this-case),
some win32 compilers define `__int32` as a `long`, but MinGW defines
`std::int32_t` as an `int`, leading to a type conflict.
To avoid this, we remove the custom `typedef` definitions for win32. The
Tensor module requires C++11 anyways, so we are guaranteed to have
included `<cstdint>` already in `Eigen/Core`.
Also re-arranged the headers to only include `<cstdint>` in one place to
avoid this type of error again.
This is a preparation to a change on gebp_traits, where a new template
argument will be introduced to dictate the packet size, so it won't be
bound to the current/max packet size only anymore.
By having packet types defined early on gebp_traits, one has now to
act on packet types, not scalars anymore, for the enum values defined
on that class. One approach for reaching the vectorizable/size
properties one needs there could be getting the packet's scalar again
with unpacket_traits<>, then the size/Vectorizable enum entries from
packet_traits<>. It turns out guards like "#ifndef
EIGEN_VECTORIZE_AVX512" at AVX/PacketMath.h will hide smaller packet
variations of packet_traits<> for some types (and it makes sense to
keep that). In other words, one can't go back to the scalar and create
a new PacketType, as this will always lead to the maximum packet type
for the architecture.
The less costly/invasive solution for that, thus, is to add the
vectorizable info on every unpacket_traits struct as well.