Fix a couple of int versus Index issues.

This commit is contained in:
Gael Guennebaud
2013-04-09 09:43:00 +02:00
parent bff264283d
commit d8f1035355
8 changed files with 46 additions and 45 deletions

View File

@@ -541,24 +541,25 @@ struct permut_matrix_product_retval
: public ReturnByValue<permut_matrix_product_retval<PermutationType, MatrixType, Side, Transposed> >
{
typedef typename remove_all<typename MatrixType::Nested>::type MatrixTypeNestedCleaned;
typedef typename MatrixType::Index Index;
permut_matrix_product_retval(const PermutationType& perm, const MatrixType& matrix)
: m_permutation(perm), m_matrix(matrix)
{}
inline int rows() const { return m_matrix.rows(); }
inline int cols() const { return m_matrix.cols(); }
inline Index rows() const { return m_matrix.rows(); }
inline Index cols() const { return m_matrix.cols(); }
template<typename Dest> inline void evalTo(Dest& dst) const
{
const int n = Side==OnTheLeft ? rows() : cols();
const Index n = Side==OnTheLeft ? rows() : cols();
if(is_same<MatrixTypeNestedCleaned,Dest>::value && extract_data(dst) == extract_data(m_matrix))
{
// apply the permutation inplace
Matrix<bool,PermutationType::RowsAtCompileTime,1,0,PermutationType::MaxRowsAtCompileTime> mask(m_permutation.size());
mask.fill(false);
int r = 0;
Index r = 0;
while(r < m_permutation.size())
{
// search for the next seed
@@ -566,10 +567,10 @@ struct permut_matrix_product_retval
if(r>=m_permutation.size())
break;
// we got one, let's follow it until we are back to the seed
int k0 = r++;
int kPrev = k0;
Index k0 = r++;
Index kPrev = k0;
mask.coeffRef(k0) = true;
for(int k=m_permutation.indices().coeff(k0); k!=k0; k=m_permutation.indices().coeff(k))
for(Index k=m_permutation.indices().coeff(k0); k!=k0; k=m_permutation.indices().coeff(k))
{
Block<Dest, Side==OnTheLeft ? 1 : Dest::RowsAtCompileTime, Side==OnTheRight ? 1 : Dest::ColsAtCompileTime>(dst, k)
.swap(Block<Dest, Side==OnTheLeft ? 1 : Dest::RowsAtCompileTime, Side==OnTheRight ? 1 : Dest::ColsAtCompileTime>