devtools/eigen
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/libeigen/eigen.git synced 2026-04-10 11:34:33 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Replace the call to int64_t in the blasutil test by explicit types

Browse Source 
Some platforms define int64_t to be long long even for C++03. If this is
the case we miss the definition of internal::make_unsigned for this
type. If we just define the template we get duplicated definitions
errors for platforms defining int64_t as signed long for C++03.

We need to find a way to distinguish both cases at compile-time.
This commit is contained in:
David Tellenbach
2020-08-14 17:24:37 +02:00
parent 8ba1b0f41a
commit c6820a6316
2 changed files with 16 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
Eigen/src/Core/util/Meta.h
View File

@@ -160,6 +160,10 @@ template<> struct make_unsigned<unsigned long> { typedef unsigned long type;
template<> struct make_unsigned<signed __int64> { typedef unsigned __int64 type; };
template<> struct make_unsigned<unsigned __int64> { typedef unsigned __int64 type; };
#endif
// TODO: Some platforms define int64_t as long long even for C++03. In this case
// we are missing the definition for make_unsigned. If we just define it, we get
// duplicated definitions for platforms defining int64_t as signed long for C++03
#endif
template <typename T> struct add_const { typedef const T type; };