mirror of
https://gitlab.com/libeigen/eigen.git
synced 2026-04-10 11:34:33 +08:00
MatrixBase:
* support resize() to same size (nop). The case of FFT was another case where that make one's life far easier. hope that's ok with you Gael. but indeed, i don't use it in the ReturnByValue stuff. FFT: * Support MatrixBase (well, in the case with direct memory access such as Map) * adapt unit test
This commit is contained in:
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
|
||||
#define DEFAULT_FFT_IMPL ei_fftw_impl
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// intel Math Kernel Library: fastest, commerical -- incompatible with Eigen in GPL form
|
||||
// intel Math Kernel Library: fastest, commercial -- incompatible with Eigen in GPL form
|
||||
#ifdef _MKL_DFTI_H_ // mkl_dfti.h has been included, we can use MKL FFT routines
|
||||
// TODO
|
||||
// #include "src/FFT/ei_imkl_impl.h"
|
||||
@@ -70,6 +70,20 @@ class FFT
|
||||
fwd( &dst[0],&src[0],src.size() );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename InputDerived, typename ComplexDerived>
|
||||
void fwd( MatrixBase<ComplexDerived> & dst, const MatrixBase<InputDerived> & src)
|
||||
{
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_VECTOR_ONLY(InputDerived)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_VECTOR_ONLY(ComplexDerived)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_SAME_VECTOR_SIZE(ComplexDerived,InputDerived) // size at compile-time
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT((ei_is_same_type<typename ComplexDerived::Scalar, Complex>::ret),
|
||||
YOU_MIXED_DIFFERENT_NUMERIC_TYPES__YOU_NEED_TO_USE_THE_CAST_METHOD_OF_MATRIXBASE_TO_CAST_NUMERIC_TYPES_EXPLICITLY)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT(int(InputDerived::Flags)&int(ComplexDerived::Flags)&DirectAccessBit,
|
||||
THIS_METHOD_IS_ONLY_FOR_EXPRESSIONS_WITH_DIRECT_MEMORY_ACCESS_SUCH_AS_MAP_OR_PLAIN_MATRICES)
|
||||
dst.derived().resize( src.size() );
|
||||
fwd( &dst[0],&src[0],src.size() );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename _Output>
|
||||
void inv( _Output * dst, const Complex * src, int nfft)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -83,8 +97,24 @@ class FFT
|
||||
inv( &dst[0],&src[0],src.size() );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename OutputDerived, typename ComplexDerived>
|
||||
void inv( MatrixBase<OutputDerived> & dst, const MatrixBase<ComplexDerived> & src)
|
||||
{
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_VECTOR_ONLY(OutputDerived)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_VECTOR_ONLY(ComplexDerived)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT_SAME_VECTOR_SIZE(ComplexDerived,OutputDerived) // size at compile-time
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT((ei_is_same_type<typename ComplexDerived::Scalar, Complex>::ret),
|
||||
YOU_MIXED_DIFFERENT_NUMERIC_TYPES__YOU_NEED_TO_USE_THE_CAST_METHOD_OF_MATRIXBASE_TO_CAST_NUMERIC_TYPES_EXPLICITLY)
|
||||
EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT(int(OutputDerived::Flags)&int(ComplexDerived::Flags)&DirectAccessBit,
|
||||
THIS_METHOD_IS_ONLY_FOR_EXPRESSIONS_WITH_DIRECT_MEMORY_ACCESS_SUCH_AS_MAP_OR_PLAIN_MATRICES)
|
||||
dst.derived().resize( src.size() );
|
||||
inv( &dst[0],&src[0],src.size() );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: multi-dimensional FFTs
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: handle Eigen MatrixBase
|
||||
// ---> i added fwd and inv specializations above + unit test, is this enough? (bjacob)
|
||||
|
||||
traits_type & traits() {return m_traits;}
|
||||
private:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user