From 128c8abf443b62b9ea60983969164c6635ec891d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Sanchez <cantonios@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 15:27:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix gcc-6 bug in the rand test.

---
 test/rand.cpp | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/rand.cpp b/test/rand.cpp
index bb90ad9c3..b5cf801f3 100644
--- a/test/rand.cpp
+++ b/test/rand.cpp
@@ -10,8 +10,11 @@
 #include <cstdlib>
 #include "main.h"
 
+// For GCC-6, if this function is inlined then there seems to be an optimization
+// bug that triggers a failure.  This failure goes away if you access `r` in
+// in any way, and for any other compiler.
 template <typename Scalar>
-Scalar check_in_range(Scalar x, Scalar y) {
+EIGEN_DONT_INLINE Scalar check_in_range(Scalar x, Scalar y) {
   Scalar r = internal::random<Scalar>(x, y);
   VERIFY(r >= x);
   if (y >= x) {