Abandon blocking size lookup table approach. Not performing as well in real world as in microbenchmark.

This commit is contained in:
Benoit Jacob
2015-05-19 11:03:59 -04:00
parent ebea530782
commit 051d5325cc
5 changed files with 1 additions and 221 deletions

View File

@@ -310,7 +310,6 @@ using std::ptrdiff_t;
#include "src/Core/arch/NEON/PacketMath.h"
#include "src/Core/arch/NEON/MathFunctions.h"
#include "src/Core/arch/NEON/Complex.h"
#include "src/Core/arch/NEON/BlockingSizesLookupTables.h"
#endif
#if defined EIGEN_VECTORIZE_CUDA
@@ -384,7 +383,6 @@ using std::ptrdiff_t;
#include "src/Core/Inverse.h"
#include "src/Core/TriangularMatrix.h"
#include "src/Core/SelfAdjointView.h"
#include "src/Core/products/LookupBlockingSizesTable.h"
#include "src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h"
#include "src/Core/products/Parallelizer.h"
#include "src/Core/ProductEvaluators.h"